Visit my main blog at Monkey Wrench Revival.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Starlings & Humans Collide


European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris)
Image Credit: Lloyd Spitalnik

If you live in the Pennsylvania, I don’t have to tell you that it’s winter time. And just like every winter, birds from more northern areas have flown south. For some North American birds, “south” means South America. For others, it may mean the tropics, or perhaps Florida and the Gulf Coast. And for some hardier birds, “south” may mean New York or Pennsylvania.

Moreover, among those birds that winter in Pennsylvania, some may not be migrants at all, but rather year round residents. These resident birds may be joined by their feathered brethren from slightly further north. In some cases, large flocks of birds may gather, such as flocks of crows, blackbirds, or starlings.

The reasons that these birds flock in the winter are several-fold. More birds mean more eyes to look for hungry predators like Cooper’s Hawks or Owls. There also appear to be advantages in find food. In some cases, these flocks can be quite large, numbering from a few hundred to a few thousand birds – perhaps tens of thousands. As you can imagine, this some times causes problems for people, the solutions for which are not always pleasant.

Last week in State College, PA, the USDA found it necessary to exterminate several thousand European Starlings that were said to pose a safety risk to airplanes taking off and landing at the University Park Airport. As it turns out, in 2006, a plane taking off from the airport struck a flock of starlings and sustained some engine damage necessitating its return to the airport for repairs. Fortunately, no one was injured in the incident, but the potential for such remains.

In an effort to prevent another bird-plane collision, the FAA ordered that a “wildlife assessment” be done and any problems identified be dealt with as required. As it turns out, the agricultural fields surrounding the University Park Airport are popular winter roosting sites for large flocks of European Starlings, as well as other birds. As a result of the wildlife assessment, it was determined that several thousand starlings needed to be exterminated.

This past week, that plan was put into action. According to a report in the Centre Daily Times, the feed tainted with a pesticide was fed to a flock of between 15,000-20,000 starlings on January 27th. The pesticide used was DRC-1339, which contains the toxic substance 3-chloro-4-methylbenzenamine hydrochloride. The toxin reportedly kills the starlings within 1-3 days after ingestion.

Proponents of the use of DRC-1339 state that the birds die in a manner that in “non-violent” and “apparently painless”. They sight the absence of convulsions and spasms in support of this claim. According to Cornell University, the pesticide kills the birds by causing uric acid to accumulate in the kidneys and blood vessel, resulting in the death of the birds from “uremic poisoning and congestion of major organs”. To put it simply, the kidneys become necrosed and the birds are not able to eliminate wastes which subsequently build up in the bloodstream. The birds become listless, experience breathing problems and organ failure, and eventually succumb to heart failure.

That doesn’t seem “non-violent” and “apparently painless” to me. In reality, it’s not a very pleasant way to go!

Personally, I have mixed emotions about the whole thing. Certainly, nobody wants to see an airplane crash due to a collision with birds. From that standpoint, it was obviously necessary to do something about the starlings at the airport. That being said, other non-fatal methods should have been tried. I have not heard or read that they were. If these methods were tried and shown to be ineffective, was there no more humane way to put the birds down other than poisoning them and causing their organs to fail?

Perhaps there is no easy answer to this problem, but we, as humans have bought these problems on ourselves. We too often resort to the most-convenient or expedient method of pushing problems under the rug, rather than addressing them at their root cause. The European Starlings are not native to North America. They are European birds, as the name suggests. We introduced them here. We have destroyed the habitats of their competitors, leaving behind the fractured habitat in which they thrive. And we detest them.



This starling situation reminds me of something Terry Tempest Williams wrote about starlings she once observed during a Xmas bird count feeding at a Salt Lake City garbage dump. Her account can be found in her wonderful book, Refuge

"I don't want to like [starlings]. They are common. They are aggressive, and they behave poorly, crowding out other birds. When a harrier happens to cross over from the marsh, they swarm him. He disappears. They want their trash to themselves."

"Perhaps we project on to starlings that which we deplore in ourselves: our numbers, our aggression, our greed, and our cruelty. Like starlings, we are taking over the world."


She continues,

"What makes our relationship with starlings even more curious is that we loathe them, calling in exterminators because we fear disease, yet we do everything within our power to encourage them as we systematically erase the specialized habitats of specialized birds."

The symmetry of starling flocks takes my breath away; I lose track of time and space. At the dump, all it takes is the wave of a hand. They rise. Hundreds of starlings. They wheel and turn, twist and glide, with no apparent leader. They are collective. A flight of frenzy. They are black stars against a blue sky. I watch them above the dump, expanding and contracting along the meridian of a winged universe. ."


When viewed through the lens Tempest Williams provides, Starlings don’t seem so bad – certainly not worthy of senseless extermination. Actually, anyone who has seen a newly molted starling in the spring will realize that the birds are actually quite beautiful. Watching a large flock of them in flight leaves you breathless.

34 comments:

robberfly12 said...

Interesting and thoughtful, Joe. I have no great affection for starlings, but I think measures like this will have zero "positive" long-term effect, and potential negative unintended consequences. No poison affects only one specie; I thought it was ironic that the original CDT article only talked about low toxicity to cats, while never mentioning blackbirds and crows. Gypsy moth spraying was sold to the public as not affecting any other species; in reality it is toxic to all spring caterpillars. Spraying gypsy moths has become an expensive, annual ritual with zero long term effect. Gypsy moths, like the starlings, are an introduced specie. We have to get away from these toxic solutions to problems we ourselves created.
--Ron C.

黑色星期五 said...

我只知道,假如我去愛人生,那人生一定也會回愛我..................................................

緊張 said...

靠山山倒,靠人人老,靠自己最好。..................................................

Al said...

That's a beautiful film. That must be what that flock by the refinery in Superior is.

Hey! I've been interested in getting started birding, but I've had no instruction, really. It's great to find somebody who knows something. I hadn't noticed your link before. I bought a birdsong gadget at Cabella's, and I try to recognize what I'm hearing when I'm outside. I'm pretty good with robins and cardinals, but that's about it. ...Mourning doves and crows go without saying.

與發 said...

hello~~........................................

林淑凡 said...

人生之中,比冒險更危險的一件事:不去冒險。 ....................................................

念強 said...

教育無他,愛與榜樣而已......................................................

Ale said...

Hi, my comment has nothing to do with this post, but there is a bird I've been trying to find and I haven't had any success. I stumbled across your blog, and figured you might be able to help me. The bird is in South Florida, more specifically in the treasure coast. It's a long tall bird (perhaps 4-5 ft tall), that looks similar to a great blue heron, but the neck is straight (not S shaped). Its coat is smooth and light brown with a touch of dark gray, with a red crown, as opposed to the white crown of the blue heron. It's voice is closer to that of the Limpkin than the great blue heron. I have a picture of it, but can't attach it here. Haven't had much luck finding what it is. perhaps you could help me.
Thanks

RafaelLetso21555 said...

廢話不多,祝你順心~^^........................................

Swamp Thing said...

I don't care for starlings, and in fact would have no problem killing them - quickly and humanely - if it seemed "necessary". It hasn't (to me), so I've not killed any.

That being said, this entire approach was completely insane. First, how in the hell is that a painless and/or humane death? Organ failure? That sounds horrible!


Additionally, as an ecologist, I can only imagine the non-target impacts. Any native birds or critters who ate the bait. Did any of the bait wash into local streams? Did it not rain the whole time the bait was out? What about fish and waterbirds?

A painless death by organ failure? What a freaking mess.

勝傑懿綺 said...

生命是一頓豐富的宴席,有人卻寧可挨餓..............................

士弘YajairaC_Tai0731 said...

文章很棒~感謝!!..................................................

詩婷 said...

Prevention is better than cure.......................................................

韋于倫成 said...

More haste, less speed...................................................

茂慧 said...

Thanks ~ ~ I will come back yo~................................................................

韋于倫成 said...

Joy shared with others are more enjoyed...................................................

佩齊 said...

閱讀您的BLOG文章,真是件快樂的事!........................................

宛儒DarwinM_Pawlak0203 said...

人不能像動物一樣活著,而應該追求知識和美德..................................................

孝齊孝齊 said...

喜歡你的部落格,留言請您繼續加油.................................................................

淑慧 said...

Man proposes, God disposes...................................................................

佳燕 said...

Poverty tries friends.....................................................................

江婷 said...

成熟,就是有能力適應生活中的模糊。.................................................................

貴寶 said...

人生是故事的創造與遺忘。............................................................

法邦法邦 said...

人生是故事的創造與遺忘。............................................................

芳容222許林堅林芳容儀 said...

人有兩眼一舌,是為了觀察倍於說話的緣故。............................................................

石薇 said...

這麼好的部落格,以後看不到怎麼辦啊!!..................................................................

佩璇佩璇 said...

開心不開心都是一天,祝您能夠笑著面對一切!............................................................

to陳mmyc又harlene延 said...

字是活的,人和環境的觀察是活的,思想是活的。不管怎樣,就是要有一兩樣是活的。否則都是平庸。............................................................

王美妹 said...

Birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you live.............................................................

陳倩江陳倩江 said...

Good mind, good find...................................................

芳綠 said...

很喜歡看看別人的生活故事,謝謝您的分享哦~~..................................................................

雅莊王edgd春2蕙婷余惠其 said...

Make yourself necessary to someone..................................................................

吳婷婷 said...

當最困難的時候,也就是離成功不遠的時候。..................................................

黃信梅 said...

一個人的價值,應該看他貢獻了什麼,而不是他取得了什麼.................................................................